0:00
hello everybody it's Zach here from ELC
0:02
license was your dock on today we're
0:04
going over another one of our practice
0:05
really exam questions yes that's right
0:07
in the series to take a deep dive and
0:09
look at some tricky task questions of
0:12
course we do post a question every
0:14
Monday through Friday so make sure to
0:16
LIKE and subscribe that way you're as
0:18
prepared as possible for your exam day
0:20
anyways let's jump right into it so
0:22
today's question has to deal with fair
0:26
housing specifically the Fair Housing
0:28
Act of 1968 all right let's see question
0:32
States a real estate agent advertised a
0:34
home for $250,000 when a Chinese couple
0:37
asked the agent for the price of the
0:39
house the agent told the seller wanted
0:42
$260,000 instead under the Federal Fair
0:45
Housing Act 1968 such a statement is
0:48
injustice for options a legal because
0:52
the Chinese family still has an
0:53
opportunity to buy a house be legal
0:56
because representation was made by the
0:57
agent not to set the owner C illegal
1:01
because the terms of the potential sale
1:02
were changed for the Chinese couple and
1:04
D illegal because the difference in the
1:07
offering price and the quota price is
1:09
greater than 10% all righty
1:11
hmm interesting so as always I'm gonna
1:16
go ahead and let you guys know feel free
1:18
to pause for reread if you want to if
1:21
not I'm just gonna jump right into the
1:23
answer so the answer is bum bum bum bum
1:28
bum bum bum see it's illegal because the
1:31
terms of the potential sale change for
1:34
the Chinese couple so in order to
1:37
understand this when you kind of have to
1:39
fully understand the Federal Fair
1:41
Housing Act so CLE of 1968 but the
1:45
Federal Fair Housing Act is a law that
1:47
prohibits discrimination buying selling
1:49
and renting finance and housing these
1:51
laws prohibit discrimination based on
1:53
race religion color sex disability
1:55
children nationality and more changing
1:59
terms of a sale because someone is
2:02
Chinese it's clearly illegal and a
2:05
violation of fair housing so yeah for
2:10
this one you know eat maybe
2:12
to play devil's advocate maybe you know
2:14
if you guess on something else maybe
2:16
you're thinking oh it's this one because
2:18
it's higher than 10% well no it's not
2:20
that doesn't matter if it's 5% you know
2:23
if it's a race issue and they change the
2:27
simples app obviously it's not these
2:30
because again it's illegal and not legal
2:32
so that leaves us with see illegal
2:35
because the terms of the potential sale
2:37
were changed for the Chinese couple yeah
2:40
that's pretty much it on this one as
2:44
always I hope you guys learned something
2:45
today please hit that like button and
2:48
subscribe for more if you haven't
2:49
already that way you guys are as
2:51
prepared for your realization but yeah
2:54
that's it for me as always Zack from
2:57
real estate license was recom make today
